Badass Therapists Building Practices That Thrive #174 Brainspotting Basics for Therapists
The real outcome is embodied knowing
When Carolyn Robistow says “the outcome of brainspotting is not insight,” I want you to pause and let that land, because most of us were trained to value insight, understanding, reframes, and symptom reduction. And yes, those things can happen. They often do. But in this approach, those are not the goal. They are the result of something deeper: embodied knowing.
Here is the way I hold it clinically. There is a difference between knowing something and knowing it.
Clients can sit in our offices for months, saying the “right” things.
-
“I know I need boundaries.”
-
“I know this relationship is unhealthy.”
-
“I know I am safe now.”
-
“I know my compulsions make it worse.”
And they mean it. They are not lying. But their nervous system does not believe it yet.
That is the gap brainspotting is trying to address. It creates conditions for neuro experiential change, where the body and brain finish something that talking alone cannot complete.
Why insight does not automatically create change
One of the best lines from the training was simple: insight does not always mean change.
This is where I see therapists get frustrated and then start blaming themselves.
-
“Maybe I’m not skilled enough.”
-
“Maybe I’m missing a technique.”
-
“Maybe they are resistant.”
Sometimes the client’s system is stuck, not their motivation. If you have ever watched a client reach clarity, then go right back into the same pattern, you already understand this. There is a difference between cognitive understanding and nervous system integration.
Carolyn gave a relatable example: you can understand that eating a tub of ice cream will give you a stomachache, and still do it. Knowing the fact does not necessarily change the behavior. Brainspotting is designed to help clients access change through experience, not explanation. That matters ethically because it helps us stop overfunctioning in session. We are not trying to talk the client into healing. We are building the conditions where the healing process can unfold.
What clients are actually doing in a brainspotting session
I want you to notice how different the client role is in this model. They are not passive or being “fixed.”
They are practicing three skills, over and over:
-
Notice
-
Observe without managing
-
Stay curious about what is next
That middle skill is the hard one, especially for high performers, anxious clients, and clients with OCD traits. Their system is trained to manage discomfort quickly. In brainspotting, we are not asking them to manage. We are asking them to observe.
Carolyn uses a movie analogy that I love. You know how you can watch a film and feel all kinds of reactions, and you want the character to do something different, but you cannot change the script? You can notice what comes up, without controlling the outcome. That is the practice.
Clinically, this is also an assessment tool. If a client cannot do a basic body scan, that is not a failure. It is information.
- We slow down and teach noticing.
- We widen capacity.
- We build tolerance.
That is ethical pacing.
What changes for the therapist
Here is where many therapists feel shaky at first. The work requires a different kind of discipline.
Carolyn names three practitioner pieces that matter in the room:
The three legs of brainspotting
Brainspotting uses “brain spots,” meaning an eye position that correlates with access to what is being processed. There are three main ways to find that spot:
-
Outside window: the therapist can locate it through observation.
-
Inside window: the client guides the therapist to the spot.
-
Gaze spotting: the client is already looking at the spot naturally.
If you are EMDR trained, you might be translating this into “protocol steps.” Brainspotting is not protocol heavy in the same way. It is more about learning how to find the relevant eye position and then holding the frame.
WAIT: Why am I talking?
This is one of the most clinically useful questions I have heard in a long time. Not because we never talk, but because we need to know why we are talking.
- Are we interrupting the process because we are uncomfortable?
- Are we rescuing because we want their distress to stop?
- Or are we responding because the client truly needs support and attunement?
If the client is subcortical, deeply in process, and we interrupt with “Tell me more about that,” we often pull them back up into their thinking brain. That may feel familiar and safe to us, but it is not always the most effective move for the client.
The dual attunement frame
Dual attunement is both:
-
Neurobiological attunement: tracking body cues, breath, blinking, tension shifts, micro movements.
-
Relational attunement: holding consent, collaboration, and curiosity.
I want to emphasize consent here because it is easy to assume consent is implied once they are in your office. In bottom-up work, we are asking for ongoing consent, and we are collaborating in a way that supports agency. That protects the work clinically and ethically.
Brainspotting and the “smarter income” question
This episode was not just a modality conversation. It was also a business conversation, and I want to speak to that directly. Additional training should increase your value without automatically increasing your workload. That is the ethical version of a smarter income strategy.
What I hear in this training is not “learn a shiny thing so you can charge more.” What I hear is:
-
learn a method that can reduce overfunctioning
-
support deeper integration without you carrying the entire session
-
expand your scope of service thoughtfully, with good documentation
Carolyn’s point was clear: when the client is doing the work of noticing, observing, and staying curious, the therapist’s job becomes holding frame, attunement, and pacing. That is still skilled work. It is not passive, but it can be more sustainable than sessions where we are doing constant cognitive labor for the client.
[If you want to tighten up your boundaries and stop leaking time and money, you may want to download Stop Working for Free: The Therapist Fee Reset. That resource helps you spot the quiet places your practice model may be costing you, and whether you need a boundary reset or a model shift.]
Three containers: one to one, self, and group
One piece I appreciated is that brainspotting is not limited to one format.
One-to-one brainspotting
This is the traditional container and often the most supportive when a client needs higher levels of co-regulation. Many clients were harmed in isolation. Healing in the presence of an attuned nervous system matters.
Self-brainspotting
Self-work can be a strong resource tool, especially for integration between sessions. It can also help clinicians regulate after hard sessions and address their own internal patterns.
There are ethical limits here. For some presentations, especially OCD, you do not want to suggest self-brainspotting as a replacement for guided clinical work. It can be part of a resource toolkit, not a shortcut.
Group brainspotting
Groups are not “one client processed while everyone watches.” That is a common misconception.
In group work, the group itself functions as a larger nervous system container. Done well, it can be powerful and efficient. This is where training, scope, and facilitation skills matter. If you are building a practice model that includes one-to-many offers, this is a place to think carefully about structure, consent, and documentation.
The clinical takeaway I want you to keep
If you are brainspotting curious, let this be your grounded takeaway. When we aim for embodied knowing, we stop chasing insight as the only marker of progress. We begin to track nervous system evidence, micro shifts, and integration that does not always show up in neat words first. That is not less clinical rigor, it is often more.
And if you are thinking about training as part of a smarter income strategy, start here: does this help you serve clients well without turning you into the one who works the hardest in the room? That is the standard I want you to use.
Where This Blog Connects:
- Want to be an LPC Supervisor? A Good Course Teaches These Essential Systems
- What Should Graduate Students Know About Clinical Supervision?
- Three Things You Must Do in Private Practice
Want to learn more about brainspotting? Check out Brainspotting.com.
For more from Carolyn, check out her Self-Brainspotting Mini-Course (and optional Guided Audio Series add-on), as well as her free Brainspotting Consultation Group for Phase 1 practitioners or higher.
Building or repairing a private practice foundation? Start here: The Essential Guide For Self-Employed Mental Health Professionals and Supervisors.
Wish you’d gotten a CE for this? You could have if you were in the Step It Up Membership. Assets mentioned in the episode are available here, too!
Blog post by Kate Walker, Ph.D., LPC-S, LMFT-S
Creator of Texas’s first fully online 40-Hour LPC/LMFT Supervisor Training Course.
Kate is the founder of Kate Walker Training, where she helps counselors, supervisors, and practice owners build sustainable, ethical, and profitable businesses.
Ready to grow your supervision practice? Check out the Supervisor Training Courses.
This post is a written summary of a podcast episode hosted by Dr. Kate Walker. We use AI to help format the transcript and check for clarity and spelling, turning spoken content into an easier-to-read format.

